I’ve been using the rockit for a bit now and I have to say I’m still not impressed with the unit. Here are two scans. The Vega scan took roughly 10 minutes, and I’d say twice as long with the rockit. My setup was features only with both units.
Hi, Frydrce
Thanks for sharing!
For front of the vehicle, if you don’t require highly detailed result and super sharp edge, IR mode is a better option whatever on Rockit and Vega. It is definitely faster than any laser scan in this case! But it doesn’t means the marker-free laser scan of Rockit is not good, it saves time on setting up markers before get started, and currently need some practice on brightness adjustment, you scan is a good step to try, and it is obvious that Rockit get better result of the logo on your car! 
I recommend you to try IR scan of Rockit, it is also a high-efficiency solution for the front of car.
I was aiming for detailed results! I would like to make fillers for the inlets down below. I’m also aiming to make ducts between the headlights and the bumper. I was hoping to be able to be marker free but it seems like the rockit could not deliver that. At that point I had to use spray. I figured if i had to use spray anyway I might as well break out the vega for the scan.
The rockit likes to get lost and lose tracking. Then when that happens it starts delivering tons of artifacts. As you stated it might work well for a small part requiring highly detailed results, but a vehicle is not its forte.
I will try some other techniques, but I think stability is a huge part of the problem, also the lack of a rewind function increasing the amount of time required for scans. I find myself having to delete full scans and starting over.
I like the einstar products and I’m trying to be patient.