The explanation screen of VEGA displays a message recommending meshing with StarVision to achieve high resolution.
However, based on my tests, I did not observe any difference in quality when comparing the processing results from VEGA itself and StarVision.
(Both were tested with a mesh resolution of 0.1mm.)
(The processing speed is about 10 times faster on a PC.)
In what cases does a difference appear?
Or is there currently no difference in performance, and is this explanation given in anticipation of future improvements in StarVision’s meshing accuracy?
The main differences in mesh between StarVision and the VEGA app is the minimum point distance limit and processing speed in some case. There is no difference in accuracy, as accuracy is primarily determined by the hardware quality of the scanner and the algorithms used.
Thank you for your reply.
I’m relieved to know that there is no difference in accuracy when meshing.
Upon researching, it seems that in past versions, only StarVision supported mesh generation with a minimum point distance of less than 0.25mm. However, since the VEGA main unit now also supports mesh generation at 0.1mm, I found the explanatory text displayed in VEGA to be somewhat confusing.
This sentence" Mesh with Unwatertight and point distance smaller than 0.25mm only supported on Starvision
PC RAM ≥32GB"
means we recommend you to use PC with RAM higher than 32GB if you want to mesh data with point distance smaller than 0.25mm. The smallest point distance is 0.1mm on VEGA device, these two parameter have no relevance.
Hope you find this information helpful.